IPC Section 381 - Theft by Clerk or Servant of Property in Possession of Master

Whoever, being a clerk or servant, or being employed in the capacity of a clerk or servant, commits theft in respect of any property in the possession of his master or employer, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Share:
Bailable, Cognizable

Official Text

“Whoever, being a clerk or servant, or being employed in the capacity of a clerk or servant, commits theft in respect of any property in the possession of his master or employer, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.”

Legal Analysis

Elements to Prove:

  • The accused was a clerk or servant.
  • The accused was employed in such capacity.
  • The accused committed theft.
  • The property was in the master's or employer's possession.
  • All elements of theft were present.

Potential Defenses:

  • The accused was not a clerk or servant.
  • No theft was committed.
  • The accused had permission to take the property.
  • The property was not in the employer's possession.

Practical Examples

What Constitutes the Offense:

An employee stealing money from the company safe, or a servant taking jewelry from the employer's house.

What Doesn't Constitute:

A person stealing from someone they don't work for, or taking property with permission.

Important Case Laws

State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh (2021)

The Supreme Court emphasized the enhanced punishment for theft by employees from their employers.

Punishment

Up to 7 years and Fine

Related Information

Connected Sections:

This section provides enhanced punishment for theft by employees. It follows Section 380.

Procedural Aspects:

Prosecution requires proof of employment relationship and theft. The case is triable by a Magistrate of the first class.

← Back to Indian Penal Code