Public excerpt
WP(MD)/15851/2023 of Subramanian. A Vs The Director - Madras High Court (Madras High Court)
Court: Madras High Court (Madras High Court)
Case: HCMD010719702023
Parties: WP(MD)/15851/2023 of Subramanian. A Vs The Director
Pages: 14
Characters (full): 17266
Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.
WP.(MD).No.15851 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 22.03.2024 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.(MD)No.15851 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.13261 and 13265 of 2023 1.A.Subramanian 2.S.Mu.Pudathy 3.P.Pitchaikannu 4.S.Irulachi 5.R.Esakkidurai 6.S.Kannan 7.S.Premma Nayakam 8.M.Panndarasamy 9.N.Sivasubbiramaniyan 10.M.Murugan 11.R.Ramachandiran ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Director, Sericulture Department, Asthampatti, Salem – 636 007. 2.The Assistant Director, Sericulture Department, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the respondents in connection with the 1/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.(MD).No.15851 of 2023 impugned orders passed by them vide proceedings in Se.Mu.No. 4102/Aa/2011 dated 24.03.2014 by the second respondent and in Na.Ka.No.11438/M3/2020 dated 22.07.2021 and quash the both as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to reimburse the recovered amount and thereby direct them to pay the petitioner's salary in accordance with 6th and 7th pay commission. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Thalaimuthurasu For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddtharthan Additional Government Pleader ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned proceedings in Se.Mu.No.4102/Aa/2011 dated 24.03.2014 by the second respondent and in Na.Ka.No.11438/M3/2020 dated 22.07.2021 and to direct the respondents to reimburse the recovered amount and thereby direct them to pay the petitioner's salary in accordance with 6th and 7th pay commission. 2.All the petitioners joined as Farm Labourers/Sericulture Workers in the second respondent Department in the year 1985. They have completed more than 10 years of service as daily wage workers. As per G.O.Ms.No.22, Personal and Administrative Reforms Department dated 28.02.2006, the Government directed 2/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.(MD).No.15851 of 2023 that the services of the daily wages employees working in the Government units of the various Departments who have rendered 10 years of service as on 01.01.2006 to be regularized by appointing them in the time scale of pay of the post in accordance with the service conditions prescribed for the post concerned. Based on the first respondent's proposals, the Government regularized the service of 520 Casual Daily Wage Labourers including the petitioners, relaxing Rule 4 of the Service Rules and created super numeric posts up to the date of retirement/date of death in the revised scale of pay of Rs.2,500-5,000/- + Grade Pay Rs.500/- with effect from 23.02.2010 vide G.O.(Rt)No.25, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi Department dated 23.02.2010. Based on this G.O., the petitioners service were regularized into Special Time Scale of Pay Workers vide second respondent's proceedings dated 28.04.2010. Under such circumstances, the second respondent vide proceedings dated 24.03.2014 initiated recovery proceedings against the petitioners stating that they were overpaid with dearness allowances during the period from 01.04.2004 to 31.08.2011. 3/14 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.(MD).No.15851 of 2023 3.Accordingly, listing the petitioners name all the amounts as mentioned in the orders were recovered from the petitioners in an arbitrary manner. All the petitioners are Basic Service Employees and the increment drawn were not because of their mistake and the mistake is fully attributable to the employers, who erroneously calculated the dearness allowance. This Court in a batch of Writ Petitions in W.P.(MD)Nos.14977, 15614 to 15616 of 2011 dated 24.11.2023 has held that Sericulture …