Public excerpt
WP(MD)/23323/2024 of V.S.Arul Rajan Vs Registrar General - Madras High Court (Madras High Court)
Court: Madras High Court (Madras High Court)
Case: HCMD011037962024
Parties: WP(MD)/23323/2024 of V.S.Arul Rajan Vs Registrar General
Pages: 12
Characters (full): 15200
Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.
W.P(MD)No.23323 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 25.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
and
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE
W.P(MD)No.23323 of 2024
V.S.Arul Rajan
... Petitioner
vs.
1. Registrar General,
High Court of Judicature at Madras,
High Court Road, Parry's Corner,
George Town, Chennai,
Tamil Nadu – 600 104.
2. Additional Registrar General (I/c),
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Melur Main Road, Ulaganeri,
Tamil Nadu – 625 023.
... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to
issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records connected with the Impugned
Order issued by the 1st respondent in ROC.No.25589/2020/Estt.II/MB and
ROC.No.23351-A/2021/B3/MB, dated 15.07.2022, and quash the same.
For Petitioners
: Mr.Sriram Venkatavaradan
For Respondents
: Mr.N.Tamilmani
Page No.1 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.23323 of 2024
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.)
The petitioner herein, while working in the Madurai Bench of the
Madras High Court, was levelled with the following three charges under Rule
17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeals) Rules, 1955,
through a charge memo dated 28.07.2021:
''CHARGE No.1
That you, Thiru. V.S.Arulrajan, formerly P.S. to the Hon'ble Judges,
now Sub Assistant Registrar (Insolvents, Accounts), High Court,
Madras, while working in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai, were habitually indulging in lending money for interest to
the Madras High Court staff members and also running Chit Fund,
against Rule 6 & 7 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants' Conduct
Rules, 1973.
By your above action, you failed to maintain absolute integrity and
devotion to duty and thereby you exhibited the conduct unbecoming
of a Government Servant and violated the provision of Rule 20 of
Tamil Nadu Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1973.
CHARGE No.2
That you, Thiru. V.S.Arulrajan, formerly P.S. to the Hon'ble Judges,
now Sub Assistant Registrar (Insolvents, Accounts), High Court,
Madras, have a bank account viz., A/c No. 722637937 with Indian
Bank, High Court Branch, Madurai, wherein, several transactions
were made by the individuals with whom you had official dealings
and others, in violation of Rule 6 & 7 of the Tamil Nadu Government
Page No.2 of 12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.23323 of 2024
Servants' Conduct Rules, 1973.
By your above actions, you failed to maintain absolute integrity and
devotion to duty and thereby you exhibited the conduct unbecoming
of a Government Servant and violated the provision of Rule 20 of the
Tamil Nadu Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1973.
CHARGE No.3
That you, Thiru. V.S. Arulrajan, Sub Assistant Registrar (Insolvents,
Accounts), High Court, Madras, were a member of a Chit Fund run
by your cousin brother, however, you have neither obtained any
permission, nor submitted any intimation or disclosed the same in the
Statements of Return of Assets and Liabilities submitted by you as
stipulated under Rule 6, 7 and 8 of the Tamil Nadu Government
Servants' Conduct Rules, 1973.
By your act of wilful suppression of fact you failed to maintain
absolute integrity and devotion to duty and thereby you exhibited the
conduct unbecoming of a Government Servant and violated the
provision of Rule 20 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants'
Conduct Rules, 1973.''
2.
Not being satisfied with the explanation rendered by the petitioner,
he was subjected to an enquiry. On conclusion of the enquiry, while the first
charge was held as not proved, charges 2 and 3 were held as proved through the
report of the enquiry officer dated 13.12.2021. The copy of the enquiry report
was furnished to the petitioner, to which he had rendered his further
explanation on 07.01.2022. Rejecting the objections raised therein, the 1st
Page No.3 of 12
…