Public excerpt

2024:KHC:32629

Court: High Court of Karnataka (High Court of Karnataka) Case: KAHC010301912023 Parties: WP/12831/2023 of SRI. DINESH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA Pages: 3 Characters (full): 2062

Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.

- 1 -     
 
 
 
NC: 2024:KHC:32629
WP No. 12831 of 2023
 
 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU 
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 
BEFORE 
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA 
 
WRIT PETITION NO. 12831 OF 2023 (GM-RES) 
 
BETWEEN:  
 
 
SRI. DINESH 
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 
# 143, 2ND FLOOR, 
C AND D BLOCK, 
KUVEMPUNAGAR, 
MYSURU CITY. 
 
…PETITIONER 
(BY SRI. SURYA KUMAR M R., ADVOCATE) 
 
AND: 
 
1. 
STATE OF KARNATAKA 
REPRESENTED BY  
STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 
CEN CRIME POLICE, 
MYSORE-570 026. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Digitally signed by
NAGAVENI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA

 
- 2 -     
 
 
 
NC: 2024:KHC:32629
WP No. 12831 of 2023
 
 
 
2. 
VIJAY LAKSHMI ASHOK 
W/O. DR. B. G. ASHOK, 
MAJOR IN AGE, 
RESIDENT OF NO.5008, 
SUSRUTHA, KHB COLONY, 
OOTY ROAD, NANJANGUD, 
MYSORE-570 026. 
 
…RESPONDENTS 
(BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1) 
 
 
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE 
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION OF APPROPRIATE 
NATURE / PASS AN ORDER QUERYING THE FIR IN CR 60/2021 
REGISTER AT THE CEN POLICE STATION MYSORE CITY AGAINST 
PETITIONER FOR OFFENCE WHICH ARE MADE UNDER SECTION CR 
PC 420 AND 406 OF THE IPC ARRANGING THE PETITIONER AS THE 
A2, AS WELL AS THE COMPLAINT FILED ON THE BASIS OF WHICH 
THE CRIME IS REGISTERED AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND 
WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE -A. 
 
 
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER 
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: 
 
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA 
 

 
- 3 -     
 
 
 
NC: 2024:KHC:32629
WP No. 12831 of 2023
 
 
ORAL ORDER 
 
This Court, on 18.06.2024 had passed a peremptory 
order, which reads as follows: 
 
“Finally, a week's time is granted to comply 
with the office objections, failing which, the petition 
would be dismissed without reference to the Bench.” 
 
 
Even today, the learned counsel for petitioner has not 
complied with the office objections. Therefore, the petition is 
dismissed for its non-prosecution. 
 
 
 
 
Sd/- 
(M.NAGAPRASANNA) 
JUDGE 
 
 
 
KG 
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 243