Public excerpt
the two propositions would be in respect of debt adjudicated by the Tribunal while distributing the proceeds the amount already paid by the award debtors during litigation would be deducted and the balance would be handed over to the Award Holder/Bank. Hence there is substance in the contention of the opposite party No. 1 that such deduction would not fetter the Court from passing an award…
Parties: the two propositions would be in respect of debt adjudicated by the Tribunal while distributing the proceeds the amount already paid by the award debtors during litigation would be deducted and the balance would be handed over to the Award Holder/Bank. Hence there is substance in the contention of the opposite party No. 1 that such deduction would not fetter the Court from passing an award…Pages: 12Characters (full): 22899
Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.
Appeals No. 25 & 26 of 2021-DRAT-Kolkata
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 25 of 2021
(Arising out of Appeal No. 04 of 2018 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
Smt. Balaka Bajpeyi, 40/3A, Mahendra Goswami Lane, P.O. – Beadon Street,
Kolkata – 700 006.
… Appellant
-Versus-
1.
Anil Kumar Gupta, 21/1, Ray Street, Bhawanipur, Kolkata – 700 020;
2.
Union Bank of India, Union Bank Building, 5, Chowringhee Place, P.O.
Taltala, Kolkata – 700 013;
3.
Jupiter Trading Company, 22B, Ray Street, Bhawanipur,
Kolkata –
700 020;
4.
Smt. Sujata Gupta, 21/1, Ray Street, P.O. Bhawanipur,
Kolkata –
700 020.
... Respondents
Counsel for the Appellant
…
Mr. Prasenjit Pal
Counsel for Respondent 1
…
Mr. Debabrata Basu Ray
Ms. Debdatta Chakraborty
Ms. Shreya Basu
Counsel for Respondent No. 2/Bank
…
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri
Ms. Saswati Sikder
With
Appeal No. 26 of 2021
(Arising out of Appeal No. 04 of 2018 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
Anil Kumar Gupta, son of Late Prabhu Dayal Gupta, residing at 21/1, Ray
Street, P.S. Bhawanipur, Kolkata – 700 020.
… Appellant
-Versus-
1.
Union Bank of India, Asset Recovery Branch, 15, India Exchange Place,
Kolkata – 700 001;
2.
Smt. Balaka Bajpeyi, Daughter of Late Nani Gopal Bajpeyi, residing at
40/3A, Mohindra Goshwami Lane, Police Station – Beadon Street,
Kolkata – 700 006.
… Respondents
2
Appeals No. 25 & 26 of 2021-DRAT-Kolkata
3.
Jupiter Trading Company, 22-B, Ray Street, P.S. Bhawanipur,
Kolkata – 700 020;
4.
Smt. Sujata Gupta, Wife of Arvind Gupta, residing at 21/1, Ray
Street, P.S. Bhawanipur, Kolkata – 700 020;
5.
Smt. Gita Devi Gupta, Wife of Late Prabhu Dayal Gupta, residing
at
21/1, Ray Street, P.S. Bhawanipur, Kolkata – 700 020.
... Proforma Respondents
Counsel for the Appellant
…
Mr. Debabrata Basu Ray
Ms. Sharmistha Poddar
Counsel for Respondent 1/Bank
…
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri
Ms. Saswati Sikder
Counsel for Respondent No. 2
…
Mr. Prasenjit Pal
Counsel for Respondents No. 3 and 4 …
Mr. Samrat Mukherjee
JUDGMENT :
1st March, 2023
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Both these appeals have arisen against one common judgment
and order dated 6th January, 2020, passed by Learned Debts Recovery
Tribunal-III, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in
Appeal No. 04 of 2018 arising out of R.P. No. 46 of 2009 arising out of
O.A. 06 of 2004, hence both the appeals are being decided by a
common judgment.
2.
Appeal No. 25 of 2021 is filed by Smt. Balaka Bajpayi, who is
Respondent No. 2 before the Tribunal while Appeal No. 26 of 2021 is
filed by Anil Kumar Gupta, who was the Applicant before the Tribunal.
3.
As per the pleadings of the parties, the facts in brief are that the
Respondent Bank, Union Bank of India, sanctioned a loan to M/s.
Jupiter Trading Company, Respondent No. 3 in Appeal No. 25 of 2021.
Appellant, Anil Kumar Gupta, was guarantor/mortgagor of the said
land. Borrower defaulted in repayment of the loan, accordingly, loan
was classified as N.P.A. O.A. 06 of 2004 was filed before the Learned
Tribunal by the Bank, Union Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as
the ‘Bank’). Learned Tribunal allowed the O.A.
3
Appeals No. 25 & 26 of 2021-DRAT-Kolkata
4.
Recovery
Certificate
of
Rs.25,91,105.30p
was
issued.
Accordingly, Recovery Proceedings was initiated. Learned Recovery
Officer. Vide order dated 27th February, 2013, initiated auction sale
process of the mortgaged property for recovery of the dues. Sale was
fixed on 14th May,
…