Public excerpt

191090110072018_e5202044d42a9773914ce789f9fd9cfb.pdf

Pages: 1Characters (full): 1334

Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA  
       (Appeal No. 229 of 2018)
            (Arising out of O.A. 299 of 2013 in DRT, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE  MR.  JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
             CHAIRPERSON
06.04.2022
ICICI Bank Limited            
          … Appellant 
              -vs-
Pawan Kumar Ruia 
        …       Respondent 
None  for Appellant
Ms. Jayati Chowdhury Learned 
Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the second round.
I have gone through the record and find that this appeal is 
against an interim order, dated 20th January, 2018, passed by the 
Learned Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal-1, Kolkata wherein 
the Tribunal below has not passed any restraint order against the 
Respondent to go abroad, however, certain conditions were imposed. 
It appears that the order, by efflux of time, has become infructuous.
However, since none is appearing to press the appeal, even on 
the second call, without going into the merits of the appeal, the appeal 
is dismissed in default.  
Pending I.A.s, if any, accordingly stand dismissed; being 
infructuous.
File be sent to Record Room.
Copy of the order be uploaded in the website of this Tribunal.
                        (Anil Kumar Srivastava,J)
                       Chairperson 
Dated: 6th April, 2022
04/ac
Search more judgments