Public excerpt

191090001812020_b1c1992dc83419a0feefb0d2666db852.pdf

Pages: 1Characters (full): 1084

Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.

IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2021
PRESENT:Dr. T. RAVI SHANKAR, HON’BLE CHAIRPERSON
Appeal No. 20 of 2020
(Arising out of S.A No. 87 of 2019 on the file of DRT, Cuttack)
1. State Bank of India;
2. The Authorized Officer,
State Bank of India
……..
Appellants.
-Versus-
1. Mr. Anil Agarwal;
2. Mr. Rajesh Agarwal
……
Respondents.
Counsel for
Appellants
:
M/s. Debasish Chakrabarti & Anindita Das
Counsel for the Respondent:
None appears.
O R D E R
Mr. Debasish Chakraborti appears on behalf of appellant bank. There is no
representation on behalf of the Respondents.
It is seen that Housing Loan in this case has been migrated into the fresh Housing
Loan Account. Therefore, in view of this appeal does not survive. Learned counsel states
that appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn in view of further development.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected, signed and pronounced by me
on this the 11th day of January 2021).
Sd/=
(Dr. T. Ravi Shankar)
Chairperson
Search more judgments