Public excerpt
191090001812020_b1c1992dc83419a0feefb0d2666db852.pdf
Pages: 1Characters (full): 1084
Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA Dated this the 11th day of January, 2021 PRESENT:Dr. T. RAVI SHANKAR, HON’BLE CHAIRPERSON Appeal No. 20 of 2020 (Arising out of S.A No. 87 of 2019 on the file of DRT, Cuttack) 1. State Bank of India; 2. The Authorized Officer, State Bank of India …….. Appellants. -Versus- 1. Mr. Anil Agarwal; 2. Mr. Rajesh Agarwal …… Respondents. Counsel for Appellants : M/s. Debasish Chakrabarti & Anindita Das Counsel for the Respondent: None appears. O R D E R Mr. Debasish Chakraborti appears on behalf of appellant bank. There is no representation on behalf of the Respondents. It is seen that Housing Loan in this case has been migrated into the fresh Housing Loan Account. Therefore, in view of this appeal does not survive. Learned counsel states that appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn in view of further development. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected, signed and pronounced by me on this the 11th day of January 2021). Sd/= (Dr. T. Ravi Shankar) Chairperson