Public excerpt
excuse and sufficient cause, as has been held by the Hon’ble Apex Court. 7. The Hon’ble Apex Court in Pathapati Subba Reddy (Died) -
Parties: excuse and sufficient cause, as has been held by the Hon’ble Apex Court. 7. The Hon’ble Apex Court in Pathapati Subba Reddy (Died) -Pages: 10Characters (full): 21515
Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.
Reportable/Non-Reportable
Appeal Diary No. 1131 of 2024-DRAT-Kolkata
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal Diary No. 1131 of 2024
(Arising out of O.A. 120 of 2020 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
NCDEX e Markets Limited, Ackruti Corporate Park, 1st Floor, LBS Marg,
Kanjurmarg (W), Mumbai - 400 078.
… Appellants
-Versus-
1. Authorised Officer, Canara Bank, Main Branch, Korrapadu Road, YSR
Kadapa Dist. Andhra Pradesh, P.I.N. - 516 001;
2. M/s. CNX Corporation Limited, represented by its Managing
Director/CEO,
having its office at 144/14th Floor, Atlanta Building,
Jamnalal Bajaj Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021, Maharashtra;
3. Anupuru Chinna Dasthagiri, Son of Pedda Khadar, residing at D.
No. 3/15,
B.
Jangalapalli,
Besta
Vemula,
Kadapa
District,
Andhra Pradesh-516434;
4. Guduru
Kulliai
Swamy,
Rural
Warehouse,
Rep.
by
Prop. P. Kullaiswamy, resident of S. No. 421/2, Tadipatri Road,
Karmalavaripalli, Village Mylavaram Mandal, Jammalamudugu, Taloq,
YSR, Kadapa District – 516 434.
… Respondents
Counsel for Appellant
… Mr. Mainak Bose, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Satya Srikant Vutha
Mr. Shourjyo Mukherjee
Mr. Aditya Nair
Mr. Dhiraj Mhetre
Mr. Vishwarup Acharyya
Ms. Anindita Chattopadhyay
Counsel for Respondent No. 1
…
Ms. Aparajita Rao
Ms. Nabanita Dutta
JUDGMENT
:
25th April, 2025
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 38 of 2025
1.
Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for
condonation of 81 days delay in filing the appeal against
judgment and order dated 25.1.2024 passed by Learned
Appeal Diary No. 1131 of 2024-DRAT-Kolkata
2
DRT-II, Hyderabad allowing O.A. 120 of 2020 (Canara Bank
-vs- Anupuru Chinna Dasthagiri).
2.
Heard the Learned Counsel for Appellants as well as
Respondent No. 1/Bank and perused the records.
3.
Appeal is filed on 20th December, 2024 against order
dated 25.1.2024 passed by Learned DRT-II, Hyderabad with
an application, I.A. 38 of 2025 for condonation of delay of
81 days on the ground that the Appellants came to know
about the impugned judgment on 19th August, 2024 when
the Demand Notice dated 2.8.2024 was served upon him.
No copy of the judgment was ever served upon the
Appellants. Appellants were represented through their
Counsel in the O.A. proceedings. 190 proceedings on similar
lines were filed against the Appellants wherein 16 Original
Applications were filed before the Learned DRT, Hyderabad,
as well as before other Tribunals. Appellants have wrongly
been held jointly and severally liable for payment of the
certificate amount. On receipt of the Demand Notice
Appellants contacted the erstwhile Advocate who was
handling the large number of Original Applications filed
against the Appellants. There was a bona fide delay on the
part of the Appellants due to which the Appellants were able
to arrive at an apprehensive understanding of its exposure
only on the first week of October, 2024. Thereafter Counsel
was appointed; certified copy was applied and obtained.
Appellants
have
their
registered
office
at
Mumbai.
Appellants had to consult the Learned Counsel. Time was
consumed in the same. Since there was large number of
Appeal Diary No. 1131 of 2024-DRAT-Kolkata
3
cases filed against the Appellants, it took time to sc
…