Public excerpt

191090001702025_d14e1f904d0db908c06b2431c86b3519.pdf

Pages: 2Characters (full): 1711

Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA  
           HON’BLE  MR.  JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
             CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Application Diary No. 170 of 2025
                                (In Appeal No. 46 of 2022)
Order No. 21
18.02.2025 
Pabitra Pran Saikia   … Appellant
              -Vs-
Union Bank of India  
           
                …  Respondent
Ms. 
Sonal 
Shah 
with
Mr. 
Kushagra 
Shah, 
Learned 
Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. 
Ranajit 
Chowdhury 
with 
Ms. Sampoorna Saha,  Learned 
Counsel for  Respondent Bank
 
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :  
 For Admission
       I.A. 88 of 2025 
Application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for 
condonation of two days delay in filing the appeal along with 
an 
application 
for 
recall 
of 
the 
order 
dated               
13th January, 2025.
Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties. I find 
sufficient ground for condoning the delay of two days.
Accordingly, I.A.  88 of 2025 is allowed by condoning 
the two days delay in  filing the appeal.
Misc. Application Diary No. 170 of 2025 is filed for 
recall of the order dated 13th January, 2025.
Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties.  
It is 
submitted that the Learned Counsel for Appellant was busy 

2
in the High Court so he could not appear at the time of 
hearing.
Having considered the submission, I find the grounds 
sufficient 
and 
accordingly 
Misc. 
Application 
Diary              
No. 170 of 2025 is allowed and the order dated 13.01.2025 
is hereby recalled. Appeal be restored to its original file and 
number.
List on 11th April, 2025 for hearing of appeal.
 
                     (Anil Kumar Srivastava,J)
           Chairperson
Dated: 18th February, 2025
03/ac
Search more judgments