Public excerpt
Respondent No. 1, ICICI Bank Limited, and Respondent No. 3, Sudipta Mitra. Respondent No. 3 and Appellant entered into a registered Agreement for Sale on the 20th of August, 2004. Subsequently, Respondent No. 3, Sudipta Mitra,
Case: Civil Appeal No. 7824 7828 of 2004 Syndicate BankParties: Respondent No. 1, ICICI Bank Limited, and Respondent No. 3, Sudipta Mitra. Respondent No. 3 and Appellant entered into a registered Agreement for Sale on the 20th of August, 2004. Subsequently, Respondent No. 3, Sudipta Mitra,Pages: 19Characters (full): 36748
Full judgment text and the official PDF are available after sign-in. This page shows an excerpt for discovery and research previews only.
Appeal No. 131 of 2017-DRAT-Kolkata
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 131 of 2017)
(Arising out of T.S.A. 291 of 2014 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
Biswajit Sharma, 181, Purba Sinthee Bye Lane, P.S. Dum Dum,
Kolkata – 700 030.
… Appellant
-Versus-
1. ICICI Bank Limited, “Landmark Building”, 4th Floor, 228A, A.J.C.
Bose Road, Kolkata – 700 020;
2. Authorised Officer, ICICI Bank Limited, “Landmark Building”, 4th
Floor, 228A, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata – 700 020;
3. Sri Sudipta Mitra, 24/1, Lock Gate Road, P.S. Cossipore,
Kolkata - 700 002.
Counsel for the Appellant
…
Mr. Prabhat Sil
Counsel for Respondent Bank …
Mr. Abhishek Guha with
Ms. Kasturi Dasgupta
Counsel for Respondent No. 3
…
None
JUDGMENT :
5.07.2022
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
This Appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated
30th December, 2016 passed by Learned Debts Recovery Tribunal-3,
Kolkata in T.S.A. 291 of 2014 (arising out of S.A. 4431 of 2014 in
DRT-2, Kolkata) in the matter of Biswajit Sharma -vs- ICICI Bank
Limited & Others whereby the learned Tribunal has dismissed the
SARFAESI petition.
2.
Brief facts of the case are that the Appellant is a Developer
who is engaged in the business of promoting and selling the flats.
Sri Ram Naresh Pandey was the absolute owner of a property;
measuring 2 cottahs 39 sq. feet situate at Mouza Purba Sinthee under
P.S. Dum Dum, Kolkata – 700 030. Sri Ram Naresh Pandey executed
2
Appeal No. 131 of 2017-DRAT-Kolkata
a power of attorney in favour of the Appellant for development and
construction upon the said land. After the death of Ram Naresh
Pandey,
his only son, Kalipada Guha (Pandey) inherited the
property whose name was mutated in the municipal records.
Kalipada Guha (Pandey) executed a Development Agreement, dated
6th October, 1997, for construction of flats on the said property. There
was another property measuring about 1 cottah 13 chittacks and
27 sq. feet situate in Mouza Purba Sinthee, P.S. Dum Dum,
Kolkata – 700 030 in the names of Smt. Shanti Roy and Smt. Manti
Roy who executed the Development Agreement for construction of
G + 4 storey building in favour of the Appellant on
23rd September, 1996.
3.
On the basis of two separate power of attorneys, dated 23rd
September, 1996 and 4th October, 1997, the Appellant developed and
constructed G+ 4 storeys building on the aforesaid properties.
4.
It appears that the Appellant agreed to sale of a flat on the 3rd
floor of the premises, measuring 977 sq. feet, through a registered
Agreement of Sale in favour of Sri Sudipta Mitra, Respondent No. 3,
for a consideration of Rs.24.00 lac from Respondent No. 1 and loan
agreement was executed. The flat in question was mortgaged to the
Respondent No.1/Bank in order to secure re-payment of the loan.
Respondent No. 3 mortgaged a residential unit, being Flat No. B, 3rd
floor at Premises No. 181, Purba Sinthee Bye Lane, ad-measuring
about 977 sq. feet, Mouza Purba Sinthee, J.L. No. 22, RS No. 811,
Touzi No. 1298/2833,1298, RS Dag No. 92(P), R.S. Khatian No. 1189,
1190, P.S. Dum Dum, Ward No. 12, District – 24 Parganas (North),
Kolkata – 700 030 (hereinafter referred to as the Scheduled property)
for securing the loan amount. The loan agreement was executed on
the 20th of August, 2004 by and between Respondent No. 1, ICICI
Bank Limited, and Respondent No. 3, Sudipta Mitra. Respondent No. 3
and Appellant entered into a registered Agreement for Sale on the 20th
of August, 2004. Subsequently, Respondent No. 3, Sudipta Mitra,
3
Appeal No. 131 of 2017-DRAT-Kolkata
handed over the original IGR to the Respondent Bank along
…